![]() ![]() So publicly we might see it as an unknown animal attack but privately we might find that it maybe a known yet "unconfirmed" species. ![]() As an example if puncture marks are found in the back of a skull there is one cat that specializes in this being a jaguar. These things are generally well known in addition to the manner and behavior after and on a kill site which varies by predator. Teeth also have their own structure, shape and length. This is known by most actual people who deal with any predator like wise curvature of a mountain lion's claw will not be similar to say a bear or an eagle the shape of the claws are different. So this extends further for example a huge kodiak might have a width of it's canines at about 2 1/3 maybe 2 3/4 inches they simply do not have a 3 inch canine to canine bite. These tend to be individual to a species for example a bear cannot leave a horse or mountain lion pug or print. So animals in general tend to have their basic body parts. They're full of shit and anything other than shutting them down hard perpetuates more of their horseshit, fantasy, and delusion. They comeback with more stupid shit like "go hangout on Bray Road" or just go to Taylor MS. I would LOVE for someone to try and put together real evidence and I have offered to pay actual real honest to God money for someone to tell me a spot where I could reliably see one of these things. Is an argument from ignorance and unfalsifiable and it's what keeps most of these nutjobs and LARPers going. "People want to argue it’s just big cats and while I don’t doubt there are ones where DNR claims there aren’t I find it pretty implausible that big cats would stalk and kill without mauling for food or be able to drag a human up such a high cliff." Months possibly over a year ago I made a thread where I started documenting all disproven sighting / hoaxes / misinterpretations. There's not even a reasonable effort into verifying information or sightings so I go hard. I come back every few months to see if it has improved, and it hasn't. I'm angry and annoyed at the perpetual lack of critical thinking in this sub. As I said, maybe in the future cryptids will only be another animal species, not much different from a wild cat. ![]() I even say "most" instead of "all" because I have no way to prove there is not even one that cannot be explain with what we currently know. Since it doesn't fit what we want to believe, we just toss that valid judgment aside. Or simply we refuse to belive when an expert says it was a wild animal when in reality an actual expert went and told everybody it was a wild animal. The forensic report might say a expert went and said something, but maybe there was no expert, or the expert was a family friend that's barely in college. ![]() That said, I think almost all of those attacks are made by wild animals and the people who identified them simply fail to do so correctly. And while I read reports on them, I do believe because that way it's more fun, you have this feel that the world is a lot bigger that we think.Įven when I am not reading them, I do believe there is more than what we see, and what we might consider urbal legend could eventually very well occupy its own scientific field. I do want to believe in this kind of mysterious entities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |